NUR 590 Evidence-Based Practice Project Proposal Presentation
NUR 590 Evidence-Based Practice Project Proposal Presentation
Assessment Description
The dissemination of an evidence-based practice project proposal is an important part of the final project. Dissemination of your project to a local association or clinical site/practice informs important stakeholders of evidence-based interventions that can improve clinical practice and ultimately patient outcomes.
For this assignment, develop a professional presentation that could be disseminated to a professional group of your peers.
Develop a 12-15 slide PowerPoint detailing your evidence-based practice project proposal. Create speaker notes of 100-250 words for each slide. For the presentation of your PowerPoint, use Loom to create a voice-over or a video. Refer to the topic
Resources for additional guidance on recording your presentation with Loom. Include an additional slide for the Loom link at the beginning and an additional slide for References at the end. Be sure to consider your personal demeanor and tone during the recorded presentation.
Include the following in your presentation:
- Introduction (include PICOT statement)
- Organizational Culture and Readiness
- Problem Statement and Literature Review
- Change Model, or Framework
- Implementation Plan
- Evaluation Plan
- Conclusion
You are required to cite a minimum of six peer-reviewed sources to complete this assignment. Sources must be published within the last 5 years and appropriate for the assignment criteria and nursing content.
Refer to the resource, “Creating Effective PowerPoint Presentations,” located in the Student Success Center, for additional guidance on completing this assignment in the appropriate style.
While APA style is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and documentation of sources should be presented using APA formatting guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.
This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion. NUR 590 Evidence-Based Practice Project Proposal Presentation
You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. A link to the LopesWrite technical support articles is located in Class Resources if you need assistance.
Resources
Loom
Loom is a free video recording tool that allows you send messages through shareable videos. For assistance on installing the software or usag
…
Avoid Common Mistakes When Presenting Your Research, Evidence-Based Practice, or Quality Improvement Projects
Read “Avoid Common Mistakes When Presenting Your Research, Evidence-Based Practice, or Quality Improvement Projects,” by Siedlecki, from
…
Writing an Abstract for a Poster or Oral Presentation
Read “Writing an Abstract for a Poster or Oral Presentation,” by Bodin and McDaniel, from Alabama Nurse (2019).
Poster Presentations: A Great Way to Share Your Evidence-Based Knowledge
Read “Poster Presentations: A Great Way to Share Your Evidence-Based Knowledge,” by Sawaya, from International Journal of Childbirth Ed
…
Using Storylines for Bilingual Dissemination of a Grounded Theory
Read “Using Storylines for Bilingual Dissemination of a Grounded Theory,” by Ligita, Francis, Wicking, Harvey, and Nurjannah, from Nurs
…
Advanced Nursing Research: From Theory to Practice
Read Chapters 22 and 23 in Advanced Nursing Research: From Theory to Practice.
Engagement of Community Stakeholders to Develop a Framework to Guide Research Dissemination to Communities
Read “Engagement of Community Stakeholders to Develop a Framework to Guide Research Dissemination to Communities,” by Cunningham-Erves, May
…
Advanced Practice Nursing: Essential Knowledge for the Profession
Review Chapter 20 in Advanced Practice Nursing: Essential Knowledge for the Profession.
Innovations in Research Dissemination: Research Participants Sharing Stories at a Conference
Read “Innovations in Research Dissemination: Research Participants Sharing Stories at a Conference,” by Douglas, Jackson, Woods, and Usher,
…
Evidence-Based Practice Project Proposal Presentation – Rubric
Introduction
Criteria Description
Introduction
5. 5: Excellent
6 points
NUR 590 Evidence-Based Practice Project Proposal Presentation The introduction is succinct, captures the attention of the audience, clearly identifies PICOT statement and the fundamental aspects of the evidence-based practice project proposal that will be the main talking points and for the presentation.
4. 4: Good
5.52 points
The introduction is adequate. The PICOT statement and the fundamental aspects of the evidence-based practice project proposal that will be the main talking points and PICOT statement for the presentation are discussed.
3. 3: Satisfactory
5.28 points
The introduction omits key aspects of the PICOT and fundamental aspects of the evidence-based practice project proposal that will be the main talking points and PICOT statement for the presentation.
2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory
4.8 points
The introduction generally presents the PICOT statement and most of the fundamental aspects of the evidence-based practice project proposal that will be the main talking points and for the presentation.
1. 1: Unsatisfactory
0 points
An introduction is not included.
Organizational and Cultural Readiness
Criteria Description
Organizational and Cultural Readiness
5. 5: Excellent
12 points
The organizational culture and readiness are thoroughly discussed and provide insight into the organization challenges.
4. 4: Good
11.04 points
The discussion on the organizational culture and readiness is incomplete.
3. 3: Satisfactory
10.56 points
The organizational culture and readiness are adequately discussed and provide the necessary insight into the organization challenges.
2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory
9.6 points
The discussion on the organizational culture and readiness is not included.
1. 1: Unsatisfactory
0 points
The organizational culture and readiness are generally discussed and provide insight into some of the challenges faced by the organization.
Problem Statement and Literature Review
Criteria Description
Problem Statement and Literature Review
5. 5: Excellent
18 points
The problem describes the issue using evidence-based support from the literature review to rationalize and justify the problem. The research from the literature review is current, relevant, and used to provide adequate rationale and support throughout.
4. 4: Good
16.56 points
The problem statement summarizes the issue and uses evidence-based support from some of the literature review to rationalize and justify the problem. The research from the literature review provides general support overall.
3. 3: Satisfactory
15.84 points
The problem statement is consistent throughout the presentation and concisely describes the issue using strong evidence-based support from the literature review to rationalize and justify the problem. The research from the literature review is current, relevant, and used to provide excellent rationale and support throughout.
2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory
14.4 points
The problem statement outlines the issue. Support from the research from the literature review is inconsistent.
1. 1: Unsatisfactory
0 points
The problem statement is not clearly stated. Research from the literature review is not included.
Change Model or Framework
Criteria Description
Change Model or Framework
5. 5: Excellent
12 points
The selected model or framework and its application to the proposed implementation are thoroughly described.
4. 4: Good
11.04 points
The selected model or framework and its application to the proposed implementation are adequately described.
3. 3: Satisfactory
10.56 points
The selected model or framework and its application to the proposed implementation are generally described.
2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory
9.6 points
The selected model or framework is and its application to the proposed implementation are only partially described.
1. 1: Unsatisfactory
0 points
The selected model or framework and its application to the proposed implementation are not described.
Implementation Plan
Criteria Description
Implementation Plan
5. 5: Excellent
12 points
The implementation plan is thoroughly described and provides the details for the various aspects.
4. 4: Good
11.04 points
The implementation plan is generally described and provides an overall outline for the various aspects.
3. 3: Satisfactory
10.56 points
The implementation plan is adequately described and provides the details for the various aspects.
2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory
9.6 points
The implementation plan is not described.
1. 1: Unsatisfactory
0 points
The implementation plan is only partially described.
Evaluation Plan
Criteria Description
Evaluation Plan
5. 5: Excellent
12 points
The evaluation plan is thoroughly described and provides the details for the various aspects.
4. 4: Good
11.04 points
The evaluation plan is adequately described and provides key information for the various aspects.
3. 3: Satisfactory
10.56 points
The evaluation plan is outlined and provides general information for most aspects.
2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory
9.6 points
The evaluation plan is only partially described.
1. 1: Unsatisfactory
0 points
The evaluation plan is not described.
Conclusion
Criteria Description
Conclusion
5. 5: Excellent
6 points
The conclusion is short, clear and summarizes the key points of the presentation in a powerful and memorable way. NUR 590 Evidence-Based Practice Project Proposal Presentation
4. 4: Good
5.52 points
The conclusion summarizes the key points of the presentation in a concise manner.
3. 3: Satisfactory
5.28 points
The conclusion outlines the broad aspects of the presentation.
2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory
4.8 points
The conclusion mentions some aspects of the presentation, but there are some key aspects missing.
1. 1: Unsatisfactory
0 points
A conclusion is not presented.
Research
Criteria Description
Research
5. 5: Excellent
6 points
Research is supportive of the rationale presented. Sources are distinctive. Addresses all of the issues stated in the assignment criteria.
4. 4: Good
5.52 points
Research is timely and relevant, and addresses all of the issues stated in the assignment criteria.
3. 3: Satisfactory
5.28 points
No outside sources were used to support the assignment.
2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory
4.8 points
Research is adequate. Sources are standard in relevance, quality of outside sources, or timeliness.
1. 1: Unsatisfactory
0 points
Few outside sources were used to support the assignment. Limited research is apparent.
Presentation
Criteria Description
Presentation PowerPoint, speaker notes, Loom voice over or video.
5. 5: Excellent
12 points
The submission is presented effectively, and all of the required elements creatively contribute to the presentation of the concepts. NUR 590 Evidence-Based Practice Project Proposal Presentation
4. 4: Good
11.04 points
The submission is presented effectively and contains all of the required elements.
3. 3: Satisfactory
10.56 points
The submission contains minor inconsistencies that are not overly distracting. Presentation contains a majority of the required elements.
2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory
9.6 points
The submission is ineffective, contains multiple inconsistencies, or is missing a few of the required elements.
1. 1: Unsatisfactory
0 points
The submission is incoherent, contains major inconsistencies, is not presented effectively, or is missing a substantial amount of the required elements.
Aesthetic Quality
Criteria Description
Aesthetic Quality
5. 5: Excellent
6 points
Design is cluttered. Materials detract from the content or the purpose of presentation is low quality.
4. 4: Good
5.52 points
Design is appropriate and integrates a variety of objects, charts, and graphs to amplify the message.
3. 3: Satisfactory
5.28 points
Design is clean. Skillful handling of text and visuals creates a distinctive and effective presentation. Overall, effective and functional audio, text, or visuals are evident.
2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory
4.8 points
Design is fairly clean, with a few exceptions. Materials add to, not detract from the presentation. Materials used were quality products and easy to see or hear.
1. 1: Unsatisfactory
0 points
Design detracts from purpose. Text and visuals are too simplistic, cluttered, and busy. Little or no creativity or inventiveness is present.
Synthesis
Criteria Description
Synthesis
5. 5: Excellent
6 points
Synthesis integrates ideas but does not adequately form a cohesive whole. Combination of elements at times is confusing.
4. 4: Good
5.52 points
Synthesis is unique. Synthesis shows careful planning and attention to how disparate elements fit together. The combination of elements is verified.
3. 3: Satisfactory
5.28 points
Synthesis integrates ideas to form a cohesive whole. Combination of elements is logical and justified.
2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory
4.8 points
Synthesis integrates ideas inadequately. The combination of elements is not logical.
1. 1: Unsatisfactory
0 points
Synthesis does not successfully integrate ideas to form a cohesive whole. The combination of elements is not logical and/or verifiable. NUR 590 Evidence-Based Practice Project Proposal Presentation
Mechanics of Writing
Criteria Description
Mechanics of Writing Includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, and language use.
5. 5: Excellent
6 points
The writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.
4. 4: Good
5.52 points
Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech.
3. 3: Satisfactory
5.28 points
Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed.
2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory
4.8 points
Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied.
1. 1: Unsatisfactory
0 points
Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is employed.
Documentation of Sources
Criteria Description
Documentation of Sources Citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style.
5. 5: Excellent
6 points
Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.
4. 4: Good
5.52 points
Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct.
3. 3: Satisfactory
5.28 points
Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present.
2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory
4.8 points
Sources are not documented.
1. 1: Unsatisfactory
0 points
Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors.