NURS 621 Delivery Models- Delivery Model Essay
NURS 621 Delivery Models Essay Write a 1,250-1,500-word essay about delivery models in health care. Include the following in your essay:
Address the triple aim as it relates to population health management and delivery models.
Discuss current trends in health care delivery models.
Describe how quality and safety impact delivery models in health care.
Population Health Management and Delivery Models
Background
Public health improvement is a major priority in healthcare systems across the globe. This sentiment is particularly true for the United States as it struggles to resolve a plethora of factors that persistently jeopardize industrial standards with respect to costs and outcomes. It suffices to highlight that some of these challenges include system fragmentation, exorbitant healthcare costs, increase in chronic disease rates (due to an ageing population), and clinical comorbidities. In an attempt to transform national health care, the Institute for Health Improvement (IHI) introduced the Triple Aim (initiated in 2007), a three-tiered framework designed to optimize industry performance. The primary goals for this program is to improve patient experience (emphasis on service quality and satisfaction), reducing per capita costs of care, and improving populations’ health. Recent statistical studies found that healthcare expenditure in the United States accounts for approximately 20 percent of the gross domestic product. Such a devastating finding affirms the relevance of Triple Aim, and similar initiatives in the augmentation of industrial standards and outcomes. The present piece advances this discourse by demystifying the United States’ population health management and delivery models. For the sake of clarity and continuity, focus shall be placed on the Triple Aim, as well as industrial trends in care delivery.
Include at least three peer-reviewed/academic references in your essay, including the HealthyPeople website.
Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.
This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. Refer to the LopesWrite Technical Support articles for assistance.
Click here to order an original nursing paper on NURS 621 Delivery Models Essay assignment
**Explore the HealthyPeople.gov website from the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Office of Disease Prevention and Health Promotion in preparation of the “Delivery Models Essay” assignment.
URL:
https://www.healthypeople.gov/
Reading material:
Read the Chapter 2 section, “Principles of Health Insurance,” and the Chapter 3 section, “Historic Foundations of Managed Care,” in Economics and Financial Management for Nurses and Nurse Leaders.
URL:
Read “No Equity, No Triple Aim: Strategic Proposals to Advance Health Equity in a Volatile Policy Environment,” by Wilkinson et al., from the American Journal of Public Health (2017).
URL:
Read “Private Insurance Exchanges: Implications for Hospitals,” by Butcher, from Hospitals & Health Networks (2016).
URL:
Read “Responding to the Emergence of New Healthcare Delivery Models,” by Hernandez, from Clinical Leadership & Management Review (2011).
URL:
Read “Insight in the Demand for Care of a Defined Population: A Key Element of Population Health Management,” by Vlonk and Reijn, from International Journal of Integrated Care (2013).
URL:
Read “Behavioral Health Integration: A Key Component of the Triple Aim,” by Laderman, from Population Health Management (2015).
URL:
https://lopes.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=109467289&site=ehost-live&scope=site
Course Code Class Code Assignment Title Total Points
NUR-621 NUR-621-O500 Delivery Models Essay 80.0
Criteria Percentage Unsatisfactory (75.00%) Less Than Satisfactory (80.00%) Satisfactory (88.00%) Good (92.00%) Excellent (100.00%)
Content 70.0%
Triple Aim 24.0% The essay does not sufficiently identify the triple aim as it relates to population health management and delivery models. The essay vaguely identifies the triple aim as it relates to population health management and delivery models. The essay identifies the triple aim as it relates to population health management and delivery models. The essay thoroughly identifies the triple aim as it relates to population health management and delivery models. The essay thoroughly and skillfully identifies the triple aim as it relates to population health management and delivery models.
Current Trends in Health Care Delivery Models 23.0% The essay does not adequately describe current trends in health care delivery models. The essay does not clearly describe current trends in health care delivery models. The essay describes current trends in health care delivery models. The essay thoroughly describes population current trends in health care delivery models. The essay thoroughly and insightfully describes current trends in health care delivery models.
Quality and Safety 23.0% The essay does not adequately explain how quality and safety impact delivery models in health care. The essay vaguely explains how quality and safety impact delivery models in health care. The essay adequately explains how quality and safety impact delivery models in health care. The essay soundly explains how quality and safety impact delivery models in health care. The essay expertly explains how quality and safety impact delivery models in health care.
Organization and Effectiveness 20.0%
Thesis Development and Purpose 7.0% Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim. Thesis is insufficiently developed or vague. Purpose is not clear. Thesis is apparent and appropriate to purpose. Thesis is clear and forecasts the development of the paper. Thesis is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose. Thesis is comprehensive and contains the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.
Argument Logic and Construction 8.0% Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources. Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility. Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis. Argument shows logical progressions. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative. Clear and convincing argument that presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative.
Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) 5.0% Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is used. Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied. Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed. Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech. Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.
Format 10.0%
Paper Format (Use of appropriate style for the major and assignment) 5.0% Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly. Template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken; lack of control with formatting is apparent. Template is used, and formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present. Template is fully used; There are virtually no errors in formatting style. All format elements are correct.
Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style) 5.0% Sources are not documented. Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors. Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present. Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct. Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.